⚡ BREAKING
Reflecting Pool Vandalism Fight Heats Up

Reflecting Pool Vandalism Fight Heats Up

Trump cites a new National Park Service witness account in the Reflecting Pool vandalism case as prosecutors weigh their next move.

President Donald Trump is keeping the Reflecting Pool vandalism case in the spotlight, pointing to a National Park Service employee’s account that former Olympian David Hearn allegedly tore at the pool’s coating before officers arrived. Trump amplified the claim Sunday on Truth Social, using a screenshot from court documents to argue that the damage was not just the result of construction problems.

The filing Trump shared says two National Park Service employees were cleaning the interior of the Reflecting Pool when Hearn came near the area. One employee, identified in the document as W-1, said Hearn appeared to use his cellphone to take photos or video of the damage. The same employee then alleged that Hearn knelt, put both hands into the water, and “violently” ripped and tugged at a large section of the blue coating. The account says the worker asked another National Park Service employee to call police and told Hearn not to keep pulling at the material. Hearn allegedly replied that park staff were “awfully sensitive about the pool” and continued tugging until National Guard soldiers arrived.

Trump described the witness as a highly credible career employee and said the account was given to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in early July. In his post, he argued that the statement supports his belief that at least part of the damage was deliberate. He also repeated claims that other harm had occurred around the Reflecting Pool, including the use of an “acid like material” on newly installed grass nearby, where “86 47” was allegedly written. Trump said there was substantial additional damage but acknowledged that contractors were responsible for some of the problems, which he tied to rushed work ahead of July 4.

The president said repairs are still underway and added that security cameras have been and are being installed. His comments came after he urged U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to take another look at the case following prosecutors’ decision to drop the felony charge against Hearn. Trump has openly criticized that move, saying he disagreed with it and later accusing Pirro of backing down under pressure.

Hearn was indicted on July 2 on one count of felony destruction of property after U.S. Park Police said he grabbed and pulled at a loose section of the Reflecting Pool coating on June 19 and kept going after a National Park Service employee told him to stop. Officials initially said the damage was more than $1,000. Prosecutors later said the Justice Department had received only limited reports from the Interior Department before the indictment and had not been given records showing broader problems with the pool’s coating installation.

In seeking dismissal, prosecutors said later-produced documents showed some of the damage was linked to flawed work by contractor Atlantic Industrial Coatings and to the push to finish the project before events tied to the America 250 celebration. They said the newly disclosed evidence made it hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hearn caused the damage alleged in the indictment. The government asked for the case to be dismissed without prejudice, which leaves the door open to bring charges again.

Hearn’s attorneys, Norm Eisen, Mary Dohrmann and Steve Levin, have said the case never should have been filed and argued that their client did nothing wrong. Trump, meanwhile, is using the new witness account to press his argument that the Reflecting Pool case was more than a contractor mistake and that investigators should keep digging. For American readers, the fight matters because it shows how quickly a local damage case near a national monument can turn into a larger debate over federal charging decisions, public property, and accountability.

Frequently asked questions

What new evidence is Trump citing?
He shared a court filing that quotes a National Park Service employee who allegedly saw Hearn tug at the Reflecting Pool coating.
Why was the felony charge dropped?
Prosecutors said later-disclosed records showed broader installation problems and made it difficult to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
What did Trump say about the damage?
Trump said some damage came from contractors, but he argued the witness account shows deliberate vandalism also occurred.
Can the case be brought back?
Yes. Prosecutors asked to dismiss the case without prejudice, which leaves open the possibility of filing charges again.
Full coverage: Donald Trump
Netanyahu Rejects Trump Gaza Plan Over Hamas Disarmament
Up Next · in World

Netanyahu Rejects Trump Gaza Plan Over Hamas Disarmament

3 min read Continue reading

More from Politics

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.