⚡ LATEST
DSA Co-Chair Fumbles ‘Taxing the Rich’ Answer

DSA Co-Chair Fumbles ‘Taxing the Rich’ Answer

Megan Romer, a Democratic Socialists of America co-chair, stumbled when pressed on what ‘taxing the rich’ means during a New Yorker Radio Hour interview.

A Democratic Socialists of America co-chair had a rough outing on The New Yorker Radio Hour after being pressed on what the group’s familiar slogan about taxing the rich actually means. Megan Romer, one of the DSA’s two national co-chairs, appeared unable to give a clear answer during a Friday interview with magazine editor David Remnick, and the exchange quickly spread across social media.

Remnick asked Romer to explain what “taxing the hell out of them” means in practical terms. Romer laughed awkwardly and said she did not have “like a solid” answer. When Remnick pushed her to be more specific, she called it “a good question” and shifted to a broad statement about democracy, spending needs, and not depending on millionaires because that, she said, means people are still being exploited. The moment landed badly online, where critics mocked the clip and one commentator said Romer seemed like someone who could not answer a simple question after taking on student debt.

The interview then moved to another issue that has long divided activists and policymakers: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Remnick asked whether the DSA favored a two-state solution or a binational one-state arrangement in which Israelis and Palestinians would live under one government. Romer answered that the organization’s position was “a free Palestine with a capital in Jerusalem,” which she said could be read as support for a one-state solution. She did not address what that would mean for the roughly 10 million people living in Israel.

When Remnick followed up by asking whether she would have accepted the Camp David Summit proposal, Romer again struggled. She said she would need to review the specifics because she did not know them off the top of her head. The exchange drew more attention because the Camp David effort is one of the best-known U.S.-backed attempts to broker peace between Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

That summit, led by former President Bill Clinton, brought together Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat at the Maryland retreat in 2000. The talks were intended to advance a two-state solution, but the effort ultimately failed. For Americans watching the political left, the episode offered a reminder that slogans about class and foreign policy can sound simple until someone is asked to explain the details.

The clip also reopened a familiar debate over the distance between activist messaging and governing reality. The DSA has built much of its brand around sharp attacks on wealth and inequality, but Romer’s exchange showed how quickly that language can unravel when pressed for specifics. For readers trying to follow where progressive politics is headed, the interview matters because it exposed how major activist figures answer when the rhetoric stops and the hard questions begin.

What comes next is less about one awkward radio segment than about the wider credibility test facing the Democratic Socialists of America as its profile grows. Voters and taxpayers tend to care less about slogans than about what those slogans would mean in practice, and this interview showed that demand for answers is not going away. The takeaway for Americans is simple: if a political movement wants power, it has to explain its plans in plain English.

Frequently asked questions

Who was interviewed on The New Yorker Radio Hour?
Megan Romer, one of the Democratic Socialists Of America’s two national co-chairs, was the guest in the Friday segment.
What question stumped Romer?
David Remnick asked her to explain what the DSA means by “taxing the hell out of them,” and she gave no clear definition.
What did Romer say about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
She said the DSA’s position was “a free Palestine with a capital in Jerusalem” and suggested it could be read as a one-state solution.
Why did Remnick bring up Camp David?
He asked whether she would have accepted the Camp David Summit proposal, but Romer said she needed to review the specifics.
Full coverage: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Bush, Obama and Clinton Essays Skirt Trump
Up Next · in Politics

Bush, Obama and Clinton Essays Skirt Trump

4 min read Continue reading

More from Politics

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.