⚡ BREAKING
Judge Blocks Trump Mail-Ballot Order for Midterms

Judge Blocks Trump Mail-Ballot Order for Midterms

A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked the USPS from enforcing part of Trump’s mail-in voting order before the 2026 midterms.

A federal judge in Massachusetts has blocked the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing part of President Donald Trump’s mail-in ballot order ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday that stops the USPS from carrying out Section 3 of Executive Order 14399 for the Nov. 3 midterms or for any earlier federal election.

The ruling bars the Postal Service from refusing to deliver mail-in or absentee ballots under the challenged section and prevents rulemaking tied to those election-year changes. It does not stop the federal government from offering nonbinding USPS guidance on ballot-mail envelopes. Talwani had already held a hearing on Friday on the plaintiffs’ renewed request for emergency relief, and the Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.

Trump signed the executive order in March as part of his election integrity agenda. The order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote and share them with states. It also tells the USPS to set new standards for mail-in ballots and orders the Justice Department to put priority on investigations of state and local election officials who issue federal ballots to people deemed ineligible to vote. Trump defended the issue in blunt terms, saying, “Cheating on mail-in voting is legendary. It’s horrible. Democrats want to use it for cheating.”

Tuesday’s decision comes after another setback for the administration at the 1st Circuit. Weeks earlier, the appeals court rejected an effort to enforce other parts of the order while a separate challenge continues. In a 2-1 ruling on July 25, the court turned down the Justice Department’s request to pause a June order blocking several provisions of Trump’s directive in 23 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia. That earlier case was led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington.

The states argued that the Constitution gives them primary responsibility for running federal elections and that Trump went beyond his authority by directing federal agencies to impose new voting requirements. Talwani previously agreed that several parts of the order likely exceeded presidential power, which led to the June injunction. The appeals court left that order in place while the administration’s challenge moves forward, and the Justice Department has said it could seek emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court if needed.

The League of Women Voters of Massachusetts welcomed Tuesday’s ruling and said it protects voters who depend on mail-in ballots. The group said it was committed to continuing the fight to protect voting rights for Massachusetts residents and for Americans who use mail voting as a secure and trusted option.

The White House, the Justice Department and the USPS did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Talwani also ordered the plaintiff organizations to post a nominal $100 bond by Aug. 18. The fight over the mail-in ballot order now heads back to the appeals court, keeping a major 2026 election dispute alive as states and the federal government battle over who sets the rules for voting by mail. That matters to Americans because the outcome could shape how ballots are handled in federal elections nationwide.

Frequently asked questions

What did Judge Indira Talwani block?
She blocked the USPS from enforcing Section 3 of Executive Order 14399 for the 2026 midterms and earlier Federal Elections. The order also stops the agency from refusing to transmit certain mail-in or absentee ballots under that section.
Does the ruling stop all guidance on mail ballots?
No. The injunction still allows the federal government to provide nonbinding USPS guidance on ballot-mail envelopes.
What is the Trump administration expected to do next?
It is expected to appeal the ruling to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.
Who supported the court’s decision?
The League of Women Voters of Massachusetts praised the ruling, saying it protects the right to vote for people who rely on Mail Voting.
Full coverage: Donald Trump
Lindsay Clancy’s ‘worst day’ came weeks before killings
Up Next · in US News

Lindsay Clancy’s ‘worst day’ came weeks before killings

4 min read Continue reading

More from Politics

View all →
🇺🇸

The Defender Morning Brief

5 stories Americans need to know. 3 minutes. Every morning. Free.