⚡ LATEST
Meta Faces $567M Child Safety Penalty in New Mexico

Meta Faces $567M Child Safety Penalty in New Mexico

A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $567 million in a child safety case, raising the total penalty to $942 million.

Meta faces a $567 million child safety penalty in New Mexico after a state judge ruled the company failed to warn the public about dangers on its platforms. Judge Bryan Biedscheid said the social media giant had become a public nuisance and ordered the money into a fund meant to reduce future harm to children.

The ruling adds to a separate $375 million penalty already imposed in the case, bringing Meta’s total liability there to $942 million. In his decision, Biedscheid compared Meta to a factory whose products create pollution, saying the company’s advertising and content were the product and that the psychological harm and sexual exploitation of children amounted to pollution that had to be cleaned up. He said the effects did not stay on the platforms themselves but spread across the internet and into the real world, placing burdens on children, families, schools, hospitals and law enforcement.

Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Threads, said it disagreed with the ruling and would appeal. A company spokesman said Meta works to keep people safe online, has been open about the difficulty of identifying and removing bad actors and harmful content, and remains confident in its record of protecting teenagers. The company made a similar response after the earlier $375 million verdict, when it also said it planned to appeal.

The case began with a 2023 lawsuit filed by New Mexico state attorneys. They argued that Meta should be held responsible for the way its platforms exposed children to sexually explicit material and contact with sexual predators. In the first phase of the trial, Meta was found to have repeatedly violated New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act because its recommendation algorithms effectively steered young users toward harmful content and contacts. Those algorithms are the systems Meta uses to automatically choose what people see on its platforms.

Biedscheid’s second-phase ruling went beyond money and ordered a set of changes aimed at reducing the risk to minors. Under the order, no account belonging to a user under 18 may be recommended to an adult, and no adult may message an underage user. The judge also imposed a one-strike policy for adult users who engage in child sexual exploitation, barred push notifications during late-night hours and during school hours on weekdays, and set a monthly usage limit of 90 cumulative hours across Instagram and Facebook for such users.

The fund created by the ruling will be used to address the harm already caused and to support prevention efforts. Most of the money, $420 million, is intended for clinical or behavioral health programs and professionals. Other funding will support awareness and prevention training for teachers and health professionals so they can better respond to social media harms affecting children.

The New Mexico judgment lands in the middle of a broader legal and regulatory fight over how social media platforms treat minors. Meta is facing thousands of lawsuits in the United States over similar child safety issues, and earlier this year it also lost a landmark case in Los Angeles that found it could be held liable for building addictive platforms. Outside the United States, regulators in the UK and the European Union are also pushing for stronger protections, while some countries are moving toward outright bans on children using social media. The UK has already said platforms may need to block under-16s and impose nighttime curfews on older teens.

For American families, this ruling is another sign that courts are taking a harder line on the largest social media companies. A separate major trial against Meta begins next week in California, where nearly three dozen state attorneys general are suing over alleged violations of child privacy laws. The message from New Mexico is clear: online safety for children is no longer being treated as a side issue, and the pressure on Meta is only growing.

Frequently asked questions

Why did the New Mexico judge penalize Meta?
Judge Bryan Biedscheid said Meta failed to warn the public about dangers its platforms posed to children. He also found the company’s conduct amounted to a public nuisance.
How much does Meta now owe in the New Mexico case?
The new $567 million penalty is added to an earlier $375 million verdict. That brings the total to $942 million.
What changes did the judge order beyond the fine?
The order includes limits on adult contact with minors, restrictions on recommendations, a one-strike policy for child sexual exploitation, notification curfews, and a monthly usage cap for certain users.
What is Meta’s response to the ruling?
Meta said it disagrees with the ruling and will appeal. The company said it works to keep people safe and remains confident in its record of protecting teens online.
Full coverage: Social Media
French Streamer Death Convictions Handed Down in Nice Case
Up Next · in World

French Streamer Death Convictions Handed Down in Nice Case

3 min read Continue reading

More from US News

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.