Abdul El-Sayed defended his ties to Hasan Piker on Meet the Press while conceding Medicare for All could mean higher taxes for middle-class workers.
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed defended his ties to Hasan Piker on Sunday while acknowledging that his Medicare for All plan would likely require middle-class Americans to pay more in taxes. The Democratic hopeful did not distance himself from the controversial streamer, even as his Republican opponent seized on the issue in the state’s closely watched Senate race.
El-Sayed made the comments on NBC’s Meet the Press and left open the possibility of campaigning with Piker again in the general election against Republican Mike Rogers. He called Piker’s 2019 remark that “America deserved 9/11” a “dumb statement,” adding that Piker had disavowed it. El-Sayed argued that the focus should be on his own record rather than “cancel culture,” and said he wanted to be judged by what he says and does.
Piker’s past remarks have drawn repeated criticism. After the 2019 comment, he later described it as “inappropriate,” but controversy around him has continued. The streamer has also faced backlash over statements about the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack, the treatment of rape allegations involving the terror group, and comments praising armed militants who injured Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas. He later suggested Sen. Rick Scott of Florida should be murdered and has also been criticized over a stream in which he appeared to use a shock collar on his dog.
El-Sayed campaigned with Piker during his primary run, and Rogers has since used that relationship in attack ads. The Republican has tried to connect El-Sayed to Piker’s claim that the United States deserved the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. El-Sayed brushed off the criticism, saying he is now more focused on the voters he is trying to reach and on building the coalition he says he needs to defeat Rogers.
“Abdul El-Sayed defended his ties to Hasan Piker on Meet the Press while conceding Medicare for All could mean higher taxes for middle-class workers.”
The broader issue for El-Sayed is not just campaign optics but the cost of the health-care plan he is promoting. He said the change would replace current insurance premiums with somewhat higher taxes, arguing that workers already see health insurance as one of the largest deductions from their paychecks. Under his pitch, people would pay more in taxes in exchange for coverage they would not lose if they changed jobs, turned 26, got married, or got divorced.
That message lands against a difficult fiscal backdrop. A 2020 analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that Medicare for All would add between $2.5 trillion and $3.5 trillion in federal spending each year on average over a decade, and the price would likely be higher today. El-Sayed’s version would eliminate co-pays and deductibles, which would make it more expansive than traditional Medicare and could push costs even higher. Medicare’s Hospital Insurance Trust Fund is already projected to run dry in the early 2030s, adding another layer of pressure to any sweeping expansion plan.
The debate also comes as the federal budget for fiscal year 2026 is about $7.4 trillion, with a deficit of roughly $2 trillion. Rogers quickly used El-Sayed’s comments to argue that the Democrat’s promise of more money in workers’ pockets does not match a plan that would send more money to Washington instead. The fight over Piker, taxes, and health care now sits at the center of El-Sayed’s bid to win a Senate seat in a state that could help decide control of the chamber. For American voters, the stakes are simple: this race is testing how far Democrats can go on progressive alliances and tax-heavy health care promises before middle-class voters push back.
Frequently asked questions
What did Abdul El-Sayed say about Hasan Piker?
He called Piker’s 2019 “America deserved 9/11” remark a dumb statement and said Piker had disavowed it. He also left open the possibility of campaigning with him again.
What did El-Sayed say about paying for Medicare for All?
He said middle-class workers would likely pay somewhat more in taxes under his plan. He framed that as a tradeoff for broader health coverage.
How has Mike Rogers responded?
Rogers has used El-Sayed’s association with Piker in attack ads. On X, he said El-Sayed’s message sounded like more money for the government.
Why is the cost of Medicare for All a major issue in this race?
A 2020 analysis projected the plan could increase federal spending by $2.5 trillion to $3.5 trillion annually on average over a decade, and El-Sayed’s more expansive version could cost even more.
We value your privacy 🍪We use cookies for essential features and, if you allow it, to send you a notification whenever we publish a new story. See our Privacy Policy.
📨
Never Miss a Story
Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.
📱 On iPhone: tap the Share icon, choose “Add to Home Screen”, then open TheTrueDefender from your Home Screen and tap 🔔 to turn on notifications. (Apple only allows notifications for saved web apps.)
🔔
Never miss a breaking storyGet free alerts the moment big US news breaks.
1Tap the ••• menu at the bottom of the screen, then tap Share(in Safari, just tap Share in the bottom bar directly)2Scroll down the menu and tap Add to Home Screen3Tap Add in the top-right corner4Open TheTrueDefender from your Home Screen, then tap 🔔 Subscribe and choose Allow
📱 Add TheTrueDefender to your home screen for one-tap access.
