⚡ LATEST
Phala Phala inquiry paused after court win for Ramaphosa

Phala Phala inquiry paused after court win for Ramaphosa

A court has paused the Phala Phala inquiry, giving President Cyril Ramaphosa more time as he fights an impeachment process over the farm theft scandal.

The Phala Phala inquiry has been put on hold after a South African court sided with President Cyril Ramaphosa in his bid to delay parliamentary hearings over the farm theft scandal. The ruling gives the president breathing room while he fights a separate legal challenge tied to the same affair.

The Western Cape high court order on Friday stopped the committee from moving ahead with its work until Ramaphosa’s review case is decided. Judge Andre le Grange said the hearings were to remain halted pending the court’s determination of the president’s challenge to the panel’s findings. Two of the three judges agreed with Ramaphosa, giving him the majority ruling he sought.

Ramaphosa’s legal team had argued that allowing the impeachment process to continue while his other case was still pending could cause lasting damage to his reputation. The president also said in his challenge that the independent panel had misunderstood its role, weighed the evidence incorrectly and read the charges against him wrongly. After Friday’s ruling, he said he noted and respects the court’s decision.

The dispute reaches back to 2020, when burglars broke into Ramaphosa’s private farm in Phala Phala, in Limpopo province, and stole money that had been hidden in a sofa. The amount was described as at least $580,000 in US dollar bills. The theft was not made public until two years later, when former spy chief Arthur Fraser sent a dossier to police raising the alarm and accusing the president of hiding the crime from police and tax authorities.

That disclosure turned the Phala Phala inquiry into one of the most politically charged episodes of Ramaphosa’s presidency. Because the stolen funds were foreign currency, the case also raised questions about possible exchange-control violations. An independent panel later said in 2022 that Ramaphosa may have a case to answer. He denied wrongdoing. At the time, lawmakers voted against setting up an impeachment inquiry, but in May the Constitutional Court found parliament had acted unlawfully when it set aside the panel’s report.

That May ruling revived the possibility of impeachment and opened the door for parliament to pick up the matter again. It also landed in a very different political landscape. Ramaphosa’s African National Congress no longer holds a majority after the 2024 election and now governs with coalition partners, which has changed the balance of power around the inquiry.

Ramaphosa is separately challenging the panel’s findings in a court case due to be heard in September. Until that case is heard and finished, the impeachment proceedings cannot move forward. Opposition parties responded along familiar lines: the Democratic Alliance said the ruling was not surprising, though it would not stop the committee’s preparatory work, while the opposition party led by Jacob Zuma, uMkhonto weSizwe, accused Ramaphosa of using the courts to block scrutiny. The ANC welcomed the outcome and urged other parties to avoid politically driven distortions as the legal process continues.

For American readers, the significance is straightforward: this is a test of how far legal process can shield a sitting head of state from political fallout while serious allegations remain unresolved. The next key date is the September hearing, which will shape whether the Phala Phala inquiry stays frozen or returns to parliament’s agenda.

Frequently asked questions

Why was the Phala Phala inquiry paused?
A Western Cape high court order stopped the committee from proceeding until Ramaphosa’s review case is decided. The judge said the hearings must remain halted pending the court’s determination.
What is Ramaphosa challenging in court?
He is challenging the independent panel’s findings related to the Phala Phala affair. His legal team argues the panel misunderstood its role and assessed the evidence incorrectly.
What happened at Phala Phala?
Burglars broke into Ramaphosa’s private farm in Limpopo in 2020 and stole money hidden in a sofa. The amount was described as at least $580,000 in US dollar bills.
What happens next in the legal process?
Ramaphosa’s separate court case is due to be heard in September. Until that case is heard and finished, the impeachment proceedings cannot move forward.

More from Politics

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.