South Tyneside has scrapped its climate emergency declaration after a Reform UK-led vote that opponents say weakens local climate action.
South Tyneside’s climate emergency declaration has been dropped after a vote by the council’s Reform UK members, marking a sharp turn in the borough’s approach to environmental policy. The decision came at Thursday’s full council meeting, where Reform councillors backed a motion to rescind the 2019 pledge despite objections from rival councillors and environmental campaigners.
Cabinet member for housing Steve Smith brought the motion and argued the council could still improve the local environment without keeping the formal declaration in place. His proposal said core services, economic growth and the cost of living should come before climate targets that are not required by law. The motion also called for a review of any policies, targets and spending commitments introduced after the declaration was adopted.
The council was also asked to restate support for clean streets, parks, recycling, flood protection and other environmental services that residents use every day. Smith’s motion said future environmental projects should go ahead only if they are affordable, backed by evidence and offer clear benefits to local people. That language was central to the case made by Reform UK members, who framed the vote as a matter of priorities rather than a rejection of environmental work altogether.
Opponents saw it differently. Green group leader Rachael Taylor said the motion set up a false choice between climate action and good local services. She said the council already weighs affordability, value for money and evidence before spending public money, and argued there was no sign that scrapping the declaration would save money or improve services. Her criticism went to the heart of the political divide: whether the borough needs a formal climate pledge to keep pressure on decision-makers, or whether ordinary council business is enough.
“South Tyneside has scrapped its climate emergency declaration after a Reform UK-led vote that opponents say weakens local climate action.”
Councillor Kate Owens-Palmer of the South Tyneside Alliance Group also challenged the logic of the move. She said she was puzzled that Reform wanted to end the climate emergency declaration while still promising to do the kinds of things that protect nature and the climate. That reaction reflected a wider concern among opponents that the council was removing the symbol while keeping much of the substance, or at least saying it intended to.
The original climate emergency motion, launched by the Green Party, set deadlines for the council to become carbon neutral. It also tied strategic decisions, policies and long-term planning to that goal while encouraging carbon reduction across the borough. In other words, the declaration was not just a statement of concern; it was meant to shape how the council made choices on spending and services.
The debate also spilled beyond the chamber. Environmental campaigners gathered outside South Shields Town Hall before the meeting to voice their concerns about the proposal. Their presence showed that the climate emergency declaration still carries political weight locally, even as Reform UK argued the borough could focus on practical environmental work without keeping the formal pledge alive.
For Americans watching local government debates at home and abroad, the South Tyneside climate emergency vote is a reminder that environmental policy is increasingly being tested against budgets, housing, and basic services. The key question now is whether the council can prove that dropping the declaration changes anything on the ground. The takeaway: voters will judge this move by whether it protects their town without weakening the climate work that affects daily life.
Frequently asked questions
What did South Tyneside council vote to do?
The council voted to rescind its 2019 climate emergency declaration. Reform UK councillors backed the motion at Thursday’s full council meeting.
Why did Reform UK members support ending the declaration?
They said the council should prioritize core services, economic growth, and the cost of living over climate targets that are not required by law. They also said future environmental projects should be affordable, evidence-based, and beneficial to local people.
How did opponents respond to the decision?
Green group leader Rachael Taylor said the motion set up a false choice between climate action and good local services. Councillor Kate Owens-Palmer also questioned ending the declaration while still supporting nature and climate protections.
What had the original 2019 climate emergency declaration required?
The original motion, launched by the Green Party, set deadlines for the council to become carbon neutral. It also tied strategic decisions, policies, and long-term planning to that goal.
We value your privacy 🍪We use cookies for essential features and, if you allow it, to send you a notification whenever we publish a new story. See our Privacy Policy.
📨
Never Miss a Story
Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.
📱 On iPhone: tap the Share icon, choose “Add to Home Screen”, then open TheTrueDefender from your Home Screen and tap 🔔 to turn on notifications. (Apple only allows notifications for saved web apps.)
📱 Add TheTrueDefender to your home screen for one-tap access.