⚡ LATEST
Supreme Court to Review Palestine Action Ban

Supreme Court to Review Palestine Action Ban

The Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the Palestine Action ban, with the case set to test how far terrorism laws can go in Britain.

The Supreme Court will review the Palestine Action ban, setting up a high-stakes legal fight over how terrorism law is used against protest groups in Britain. The court said on Thursday that Huda Ammori, the group’s co-founder, can appeal the proscription that took effect in July 2025.

The move marks a setback for the Home Office and follows a lengthy dispute over whether the government went too far by using terrorism powers against the group. The reasons for the appeal have not yet been published, but the BBC understands Ammori’s case centres on the argument that the ban breaches human rights. Officials say the hearing will be fast-tracked and take place after the summer break.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the government will defend the case firmly. She said the Court of Appeal had upheld the ban and argued that Palestine Action was not a normal protest or civil disobedience group. In her statement, she said the group had carried out acts of terrorism, praised people involved in those acts and encouraged violence. She added that lawful protest in support of Palestinians is still protected and that there is a difference between backing Palestine and backing a proscribed group.

The fight over the Palestine Action ban has already moved through several courts. Former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper ordered the group proscribed on advice from police and security officials after a wave of break-ins aimed at Elbit, an Israeli-owned defence company. The High Court initially said the ban was unlawful, but five judges at the Court of Appeal later overturned that ruling and unanimously said Cooper had acted within her powers.

That decision is now headed to the Supreme Court, where the outcome could shape how terrorism legislation is interpreted in the UK. The law, approved by MPs, allows ministers to ban a group if it is linked to serious violence or serious criminal damage carried out for an ideological cause. It also gives police broader powers to investigate and charge people over organising activity and fundraising tied to a proscribed group.

The case comes after the first major trial involving members of Palestine Action ended only weeks ago. Four people were jailed over a break-in at a defence company near Bristol that caused more than £1 million in damage. One of them was also sentenced for grievous bodily harm after a police officer was hit with a sledgehammer.

The dispute has also triggered a wider wave of arrests and court cases. More than 2,000 people are facing possible prosecution for allegedly showing support for the banned group at mass protests. On Thursday, 117 protesters were arrested outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court, with police saying most were detained for expressing support for Palestine Action. Many had gathered there expecting to appear in court over earlier public events, only to find those cases had been listed in error.

Ammori welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision and said she would keep fighting the proscription, including through the European Court of Human Rights if needed. Her side casts the ban as one of the harshest assaults on speech and protest in modern Britain, while the government says it is a necessary step to protect public safety and national security. The case matters because it will help define where lawful protest ends and terrorism powers begin, with consequences well beyond this one group.

Frequently asked questions

What did the Supreme Court decide on Thursday?
It said Huda Ammori can appeal the proscription of Palestine Action. The court will fast-track the hearing after the summer break.
Why did the government ban Palestine Action?
Former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper proscribed the group after break-ins targeting Elbit, an Israeli-owned defence company. The government says the group carried out acts of terrorism and encouraged violence.
What have other courts said about the ban so far?
The High Court initially ruled the ban unlawful, but the Court of Appeal later overturned that decision and said Cooper acted within her powers.
What wider impact could the case have?
It could help define where lawful protest ends and terrorism powers begin. The law also affects police powers over organising activity and fundraising linked to a proscribed group.

More from World

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.