⚡ LATEST
Uefa Hits Back at Fifa World Cup Investment Plan

Uefa Hits Back at Fifa World Cup Investment Plan

The Fifa investment plan could lift football development funding above $10bn, but Uefa and Andy Burnham say the move crosses a line.

The Fifa investment plan is facing fierce resistance after European football’s governing body and Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham criticized proposals that would bring private money into the sport’s biggest competitions, including the World Cup. Fifa says the plan would expand football development funding beyond $10bn and create a new vehicle for outside investment, but critics say it risks turning the game into a commercial asset.

The issue centers on Fifa Forward Enterprise, a new subsidiary that Fifa says would take minority, non-controlling investments from third parties while consolidating commercial and event operations. The plan still needs approval from Fifa’s 211 member nations. If it goes ahead, Fifa says Thrive Eternal is expected to lead the investor group. Thrive is an American venture capital firm founded by Joshua Kushner, who is the brother of Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law.

Fifa has said it is not discussing Gianni Infantino, or anyone else, taking the chief executive role at the new company. The organization has also said Infantino and the wider body have a duty to guide the project, though it has not explained in detail what that means. Fifa says it would keep control of FFE and retain exclusive authority over football governance, competitions, the international match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions.

Infantino argued that the sport should spread its wealth more widely. He said that parts of football have already turned popularity into major commercial value, and that Fifa’s role is to make sure development reaches every part of the game. Under the proposal, each member association could access up to $20m in one-time capital for development projects.

Uefa rejected that logic in unusually blunt terms. In its response, the European governing body said the proposal “crosses a line” and warned that the soul and governance of football are not things to be traded. Uefa also said it was troubled by the lack of transparency over who would benefit financially and urged national associations and other stakeholders to take the matter seriously.

Burnham went even further, saying that if Fifa went ahead it would have “sold out.” Writing on X, he said football belongs to the fans, not investors, and described the World Cup as the greatest competition in world sport. The Football Association said it had not been aware of Fifa’s plans when they were released, adding another layer of surprise to a proposal that appears to have arrived before many in the sport were ready for it.

The background here matters. Fifa says its structure would resemble arrangements used in other sports, and it points to examples such as Premiership Rugby’s partnership with private equity firm CVC Capital Partners in 2018. But Uefa and others see a different risk: if Fifa wants more revenue from competitions, it may push for bigger tournaments and more frequent events, including pressure for a 64-team World Cup and a World Cup every two years. That would not only reshape the international calendar; it could also squeeze domestic leagues and alter the balance of power in world football.

The next steps are already taking shape. The plan is expected to come up at the next Fifa Council meeting in the autumn, then around the Fifa Intercontinental Cup in December, before a possible vote at the Fifa Congress in Morocco in March. For American readers, the story matters because it shows how global sports money, private capital, and political ties can collide around a tournament watched around the world — and the outcome could affect who controls the game and how much of it fans are asked to absorb.

Frequently asked questions

What is Fifa proposing with this investment plan?
Fifa wants to create Fifa Forward Enterprise, a new subsidiary that would take minority, non-controlling investments from third parties. Fifa says it would keep control over football governance, competitions, the international match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions.
Why are Uefa and Andy Burnham opposed to the plan?
Uefa said the proposal “crosses a line” and warned that the soul and governance of football are not things to be traded. Burnham said football belongs to the fans, not investors, and that Fifa would have “sold out” if it went ahead.
How much money could national associations receive under the proposal?
Fifa said each member association could access up to $20 million in one-time capital for development projects.
What happens next for the proposal?
It is expected to come up at the next Fifa Council meeting in the autumn and around the Fifa Intercontinental Cup in December, before a possible vote at the Fifa Congress in Morocco in March.

More from World

View all →
📨

Never Miss a Story

Get the headlines that matter delivered straight to your inbox.